mfi(4) IO performance regression, post 8.1

[Charles Owens]

No reason other than history... will be changing over at some point.


Charles Owens
Great Bay Software, Inc.


On 6/15/12 10:38 AM, Brian W. wrote:
>
> Curious why you are preferring i386 +PAE as opposed to amd64?
>
> On Jun 15, 2012 4:09 AM, "Charles Owens" <cowens at greatbaysoftware.com 
> <mailto:cowens at greatbaysoftware.com>> wrote:
>
>     Yes, of course. So far I can say that the major shift appears to
>     have occurred between 8.1 and 8.2 .
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Charles Owens
>     Great Bay Software,  Inc.
>
>     Sent from my phone
>
>     ----- Reply message -----
>     From: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian at freebsd.org <mailto:adrian at freebsd.org>>
>     To: "Charles Owens" <cowens at greatbaysoftware.com
>     <mailto:cowens at greatbaysoftware.com>>
>     Cc: <stable at freebsd.org <mailto:stable at freebsd.org>>
>     Subject: mfi(4) IO performance regression, post 8.1
>     Date: Fri, Jun 15, 2012 1:55 am
>
>
>     Hm, can you try different subversion checkouts of the kernel tree
>     between 8.1 and 8.3, to pinpoint which commit(s) broke things?
>
>
>
>     ADrian
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     freebsd-stable at freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-stable at freebsd.org>
>     mailing list
>     http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>     To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>     "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org
>     <mailto:freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org>"
>