[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

[Garrett Cooper]

(mav@, powerpc@, stable@, SuperBisquit BCCed)

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
<freebsd at jdc.parodius.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 05:31:15PM -0500, Super Bisquit wrote:
>> I still say that the system should be built natively on powerpc equipment.
>
> What relevancy does that have to the situation?  We're seeing the same
> for other architectures, not just powerpc.
>
> 4516     01/02 21:53  FreeBSD Tinderbox   (3.9K) [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386
> 4517     01/02 22:07  FreeBSD Tinderbox   (3.9K) [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64
> 4518     01/02 22:46  FreeBSD Tinderbox   (3.9K) [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98
> 4519     01/03 00:11  FreeBSD Tinderbox   (3.9K) [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
> 4520     01/03 00:15  FreeBSD Tinderbox   (3.9K) [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc
> 4522     01/03 00:57  FreeBSD Tinderbox   (3.9K) [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc
>
> This is obviously a "botched" commit by mav@ that breaks RELENG_9 but
> not RELENG_8.
>
> In CVS I see no further commits to fix this, so I'm CC'ing mav@ here.

    This is yet another transient out-of-sync tinderbox issue that
I've seen for the past year on current@ (and I'm sure has been
happening longer). I've raised the concern to cluster@, des@, and
tinderbox at .
Thanks,
-Garrett