ld: kernel.debug: Not enough room for program headers

[Jeremy Chadwick]

On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 12:54:58PM -0700, Warren Block wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Feb 2012, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> 
> >On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 10:48:16AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >>On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 10:57:40AM -0700, Warren Block wrote:
> >>>Trying to build 8-stable i386 for the last couple of days gives this
> >>>error when building the kernel:
> >>>
> >>>/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc -c -O -pipe -march=prescott -std=c99 -g -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes  -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual  -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -nostdinc  -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/altq -D_KERNEL -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000  -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2  -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 -ffreestanding -fstack-protector -Werror  vers.c
> >>>linking kernel.debug
> >>>ld: kernel.debug: Not enough room for program headers (allocated 5, need 6)
> >>>ld: final link failed: Bad value
> >>>*** Error code 1
> >>>1 error
> >>>*** Error code 2
> >>>1 error
> >>>*** Error code 2
> >>>1 error
> >>
> >>The freebsd-stable mailing list has been filled with tinderbox failures
> >>for this exact problem with the LINT kernel, and it appears to be
> >>specific to RELENG_8 on i386.
> >>
> >>http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-February/thread.html
> >>
> >>Start from the bottom and search upwards for the string:
> >>"[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386"
> >>
> >>Point being: the problem is not you.
> >>
> >
> >This is why I don't like ccache. Technically the problem is there but
> >also coexists within the source itself. For whatever reason I would
> >believe a cached copy of already built source is having some collisions.
> >As already stated "NO CCACHE" the kernel can be built with what I
> >posted on three different machines.
> 
> But it still does (did) not build here with NOCCACHE set, so it's
> not a ccache problem.

Correct.  And from what I can tell, the tinderbox builds don't use
ccache either, so I'm not sure what Jason is getting at.  :-)

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwick                                 jdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking                     http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator                 Mountain View, CA, US |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.             PGP 4BD6C0CB |