FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 Available...
kostikbel at gmail.com
Fri Aug 24 05:18:35 UTC 2012
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 05:41:49PM -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:37:04 -0500, Walter Hurry <walterhurry at gmail.com>
> >One thing (welcome, but puzzling) which surprised me was that my
> >vboxguest.ko did *not* need to be recompiled. How did the upgrade manage
> FreeBSD has a stable ABI unlike Linux. A kernel module compiled for any
> 9.x release should work on any other 9.x release without needing to be
This is a statement that is false at least two times, if not three.
This was a question about Kernel Binary Inteface, not Application
First, we have zero guarantees about ability to load or have a system
survive loading of the module compiled against the later kernel.
Second, we do not have real KBI definition, and KBI stability is managed
only ad-hock. E.g. VFS quite often breaks, while network or disk controllers
drivers are usually fine.
YMMV. Snobby false statements hurt the project.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20120824/ae3bdf78/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-stable