Policy on static linking ?

Jean-Yves Avenard jyavenard at gmail.com
Sun Jan 16 01:17:29 UTC 2011


Hi

On 15 January 2011 23:48, Jilles Tjoelker <jilles at stack.nl> wrote:

>
> The approach has been used by Debian for some time.
>
> Links:
> http://chris.dzombak.name/blog/2010/03/building-openssl-with-symbol-versioning/
> http://chris.dzombak.name/files/openssl/openssl-0.9.8l-symbolVersioning.diff
> http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1222&user=guest&pass=guest

This sounds very interesting.

I do have trouble understanding on how this would make a difference
with how it's currently working.

base openssl uses libssl.so.6 and libcrypto.so.6

current port openssl is using .so.7

So they too have different sonames; How could changing this to
.so.0.9.8 for base and so.1.0.2 for port make things behave
differently?

JY


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list