patch for topology detection of Intel CPUs
freebsd at jdc.parodius.com
Mon Sep 6 13:12:06 UTC 2010
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:56:01PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 06/09/2010 15:23 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
> > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:17:42PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 29/08/2010 12:25 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> >>> The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tree, it should be applied
> >>> either to sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c or sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c depending
> >>> on the desired architecture:
> >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/intel-cpu-topo.diff
> >> I see that I am not getting as many testers as I expected, so I am going to commit
> >> the patch.
> >> You still have a short while to either objectively object to the patch or to
> >> voluntary test it :-)
> > I would gladly assist in testing this, except there doesn't appear to be
> > an authoritative statement that it will apply to RELENG_8; when I see
> > WIP, I assume -CURRENT/HEAD only.
> patch -C is much better than any statement :)
> > Let me know, since all the systems I have are Intel multi-core.
> Yes, the patch should be applicable to stable/8 without any issues.
Great, thanks! I'll be testing this out on two separate systems, both
- Supermicro X7SBA + Intel C2D E8400 (stepping 10)
- Supermicro X7SBL-LN2 + Intel C2D E6600 (stepping 6)
I'll make sure to provide what the topology looks like before and after.
Is CPU-relevant dmesg output sufficient?
| Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |
More information about the freebsd-stable