zpool vdev vs. glabel
Gerrit Kühn
gerrit at pmp.uni-hannover.de
Wed Feb 10 09:29:16 UTC 2010
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:18:49 +0100 Marius Nünnerich <marius at nuenneri.ch>
wrote about Re: zpool vdev vs. glabel:
MN> It seems there is some kind of race condition with zfs either picking
MN> up the disk itself or the label device for the same disk. I guess it's
MN> which ever it probes first.
This could explain it. However, it seems that zfs sticks to the da device
once it changed it's mind. Meanwhile I discovered one more system where is
obviously has happened (although I cannot say when:
luna# zpool status
pool: tank
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
tank ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0
label/disk-1 ONLINE 0 0 0
da0 ONLINE 0 0 0
label/disk-2 ONLINE 0 0 0
label/disk-3 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
MN> I wrote the GPT part of glabel for using
MN> it in situations like this, I had not a single report of this kind of
MN> problem with the gpt labels. Maybe you can try them too?
Yeah, I just have to look into how gpt labels work. I did not use them at
all up to now.
cu
Gerrit
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list