Upcoming Releases Schedule...
dalroi at solfertje.student.utwente.nl
Thu Sep 18 20:09:43 UTC 2008
On Sep 18, 2008, at 9:23 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
> On Sep 18, 2008, at 12:01 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
>> Let's consider three more productive avenues by which you can
>> offer assistance with the problem of how to increase branch
>> support lifetimes:
>> (1) Become a contributor to the community by developing and
>> patches against unsupported branches, especially against older
>> such as 4.x and 5.x where the branches are open for commits but
>> fallen out of support status. I can't promise the results will
> We have no 4.x or 5.x systems nor do we have any interest in
> maintaining those. So perhaps a good idea, but not something I can
> help with.
> I *did* offer to work on maintenance for 6.2, but was told it would
> be rejected by the developers. Would I extend effort to do exactly
> what I am talking about -- extending the support lifetime for very
> recent releases? Absolutely. If its in a form useful for the
> community as a whole.
Are you seriously insisting that a minor release should be supported
for more than a year? I think that's pretty exceptional already for
any piece of software, and yet you want to extend that?
I don't know what your line of work demands, but maybe you're not as
constrained as you think you are? The support lifetime of FreeBSD 6
(the major release) is estimated to be up to somewhere in 2010,
according to the release information, which seems to satisfy your needs.
To me this is a rhetorical question only, I have no way to apply any
answers I get to these questions. I'm not involved in the FreeBSD
project or in your line of work, I'm just a humble user and supporter.
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.
More information about the freebsd-stable