SchedULE vs BSD scheduler

Oliver Fromme olli at lurza.secnetix.de
Fri Mar 14 16:43:53 UTC 2008


Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
 > Oliver Fromme wrote:
 > > Those machines work very well with both FreeBSD 6 and 7.
 > > If you install FreeBSD 7, remember to enable ULE instead
 > > of the default BSD scheduler.
 > 
 > What's the advantage of ULE / disadvantage of the default?
 > Is it specific to this hardware?

I generally recommend to use ULE on FreeBSD 7 because
it behaves better for interactive use, especially on
SMP systems (but it seems to improve interactivity on
UP systems, too).  It's not specific to this hardware.

Note that SCHED_ULE is now the default in 7-stable,
and will be the default in 7.1-RELEASE.  The change
was done shortly after 7.0-RELEASE.

Best regards
   Oliver

-- 
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M.
Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606,  Geschäftsfuehrung:
secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün-
chen, HRB 125758,  Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart

FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr:  http://www.secnetix.de/bsd

With Perl you can manipulate text, interact with programs, talk over
networks, drive Web pages, perform arbitrary precision arithmetic,
and write programs that look like Snoopy swearing.


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list