challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3
Clifton Royston
cliftonr at lava.net
Fri Jun 6 16:39:43 UTC 2008
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 12:08:54PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> On Jun 4, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Clifton Royston wrote:
>
> > Speaking just for myself, I'd love to get a general response from
> >people who have run servers on both as to whether 6.3 is on average
> >more stable than 6.2. I really haven't gotten any clear impression as
>
> I'll throw in my "+1" for running 6.3. I have it on many boxes, some
> of which run gmirror and some of which have bge devices (some with
> both). Never any problems. They operate things varying from Postgres
> servers to DNS servers to mail servers (postfix) under pretty
> consistent load pushing lots and lots of data both network and to disk.
Thanks. That sounds like the kind of broad experience I need,
particularly as the main group of servers are mail servers (spam
filtering machines running Postfix, with some config files on NFS.)
-- Clifton
--
Clifton Royston -- cliftonr at iandicomputing.com / cliftonr at lava.net
President - I and I Computing * http://www.iandicomputing.com/
Custom programming, network design, systems and network consulting services
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list