[simon@FreeBSD.org: cvs commit: src/crypto/openssl/ssl d1_both.c ?dtls1.h ssl.h ssl_err.c]

[Oliver Fromme]

Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
 > RELENG_7 isn't -STABLE yet

Uhm, are you sure?  In the past, whenever a new RELENG
branch was created, it was implicitly the next -stable
branch, because -current moved on to the next version
number.  Did that policy change?

If it did change, I'm curious to know what the version
7 branch is called right now (6 being -stable and 8
being -current)?  I assume we do not have two -current
branches at the same time, do we?

Best regards
   Oliver

PS:  I do agree that the DTLS security fix doesn't need
a FreeBSD Security Advisory, for the reason that it
doesn't seem to affect any _released_ FreeBSD version.

-- 
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M.
Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606,  Geschäftsfuehrung:
secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün-
chen, HRB 125758,  Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart

FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr:  http://www.secnetix.de/bsd

"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.  However, this
is not necessarily a good idea.  It is hard to be sure where
they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting
under them as they fly overhead." -- RFC 1925