LOCK_PROFILING in -stable
Alfred Perlstein
alfred at freebsd.org
Sat Oct 20 12:30:17 PDT 2007
* Robert Watson <rwatson at FreeBSD.org> [071020 10:21] wrote:
>
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >>Hey guys, I have LOCK_PROFILING done for a product based on FreeBSD-6,
> >>this means I can relatively easily backport LOCK_PROFILING from FreeBSD-7
> >>to FreeBSD-6.
> >>
> >>Do we want this?
> >>
> >>I'd like to do it if people want it.
> >
> >I think it should be done, performance is a lot better than the old 6.x
> >version and it also adds another very useful performance metric (time
> >spent waiting for the lock). The only concern is that it doesn't break
> >ABI support when not compiled in, but I'm pretty sure you've already told
> >me this is OK. Thanks for looking at this.
>
> This is my feeling also -- I would consider ABI breakage a show stopper for
> 6.x, but feel otherwise that the new code is much more mature and capable
> and would be quite beneficial to people building appliances and related
> products on 6.x. You might check with Attilio about whether there are any
> remaining outstanding issues that need to be resolved first, and make sure
> to send a heads up out on stable@ and put a note in UPDATING that the
> option and details have changed.
I still get confused as to the meaning of this...
It only breaks ABI when it's enabled.
I think that is OK, right?
--
- Alfred Perlstein
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list