Quation about HZ kernel option

[Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri]

On 10/5/07, Doug Barton <dougb at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > What value of HZ option would you recommend for a hosting (web) server
> > with a lot of processes (about 900) and polling off (as decided from
> > previous discussion polling is useless in this situation).
>
> Is this an SMP system? If so you'd probably be well served by testing the
> latest 7.0-current (which will soon be a beta for 7.0-release) with the
> ULE scheduler. That's likely to have more benefit for you than changing
> HZ, although setting it to 100 is probably going to be better than 1000
> for reasons others have already mentioned.
>
> hth,
>
> Doug
>
> --
>
>      This .signature sanitized for your protection

Hello,

Thank you for the nice discussion guys, I have server with dual xeon
cpus, and C2D I switched kern.hz to 100 instead of 1000.


-- 
Regards,

-Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri
Arab Portal
http://www.WeArab.Net/