ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?!

Björn König bkoenig at cs.tu-berlin.de
Fri Sep 15 05:54:52 PDT 2006


Jamie Bowden schrieb:
> On 9/9/06, Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews at isc.org> wrote:
> 
>> > Yeah, -STABLE is what you should run if you want stable code, right?
> 
> 
>>         No. STABLE means STABLE API.
> 
> 
>>         If you want stable code you run releases.  Between releases
>>         stable can become unstable.  Think of stable as permanent
>>         BETA code.  Changes have passed the first level of testing
>>         in current which is permanent ALPHA code.
> 
> 
> No, this is what it means now. [...]

Why do you say "No" if you mean "Yes, but in former times ..."?

Björn


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list