ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?!
Björn König
bkoenig at cs.tu-berlin.de
Fri Sep 15 05:54:52 PDT 2006
Jamie Bowden schrieb:
> On 9/9/06, Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews at isc.org> wrote:
>
>> > Yeah, -STABLE is what you should run if you want stable code, right?
>
>
>> No. STABLE means STABLE API.
>
>
>> If you want stable code you run releases. Between releases
>> stable can become unstable. Think of stable as permanent
>> BETA code. Changes have passed the first level of testing
>> in current which is permanent ALPHA code.
>
>
> No, this is what it means now. [...]
Why do you say "No" if you mean "Yes, but in former times ..."?
Björn
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list