ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?!

[Björn König]

Vivek Khera schrieb:
> 
> On Sep 12, 2006, at 6:23 PM, hackmiester (Hunter Fuller) wrote:
> 
>>> -STABLE is still a development branch without guarantee of a  stable 
>>> and working operating system.
>>
>>
>> Hahahahaha... That's ironic...
> 
> 
> No, just misinterpretation of which attribute of the system to which  
> the word "stable" applies.
> 

Do you really think I misinterpreted the meaning of -STABLE? *I* think 
most people misinterprete -STABLE because the first thing that comes to 
mind is runtime stability. The same issue exists in the GNU/Debian Linux 
world: Debian stable doesn't mean that the system run always rock-solid 
and works perfectly, but rather the state of software is stable, i.e. 
maintainers ensure 100% compatibility between updates.

Regards
Björn