ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?!

Marc G. Fournier scrappy at freebsd.org
Sat Sep 9 20:55:47 PDT 2006


On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 11:16:29PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>
>> This should be documented somewhere clearly then, as my understanding was
>> that -STABLE meant that anything MFCd back to it *was* tested and deemed
>> stable ...
>
> You mean like in the FreeBSD handbook?  It's not anyone else's fault
> if you haven't read the documentation.
>
>  http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html

I swear, the last time I searched for a definition of STABLE vs 
CURRENT/HEAD, that wsan't there ... but, granted, that was a very very 
long time ago ...


----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy at hub.org                              MSN . scrappy at hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list