IPv6 and IPFW

Max Laier max at love2party.net
Sat Feb 18 20:34:39 PST 2006


On Sunday 19 February 2006 02:34, Peter Losher wrote:
> Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> > The ipfw in 6-STABLE has an IPv6 awareness, but it is not enabled as
> > far as you use ipfw as a KLD module.  If ipfw is compiled into kernel,
> > ipfw does filterling an IPv6 as well.
>
> Will this change in 6.1, or will we have to wait for ip6fw to be
> completly removed before the module will support v6 by default? (You
> would have to admit that it's somewhat confusing the way it is now)

IPFW[2] has gained some IPv6 functionality lately and was supposed to replace 
IP6FW in the long run.  It turned out, however, that IPFW[2] is not a 
complete in-place replacement for IP6FW as IPFW2 syntax has diverted from the 
IPFW1/IP6FW syntax too much.  I am unsure about the plans for IPFW+IPv6 in 
RELENG_6, HEAD certainly moves to removal of IP6FW, but more testers as 
required.

Any datapoints with HEAD's version of IPFW+IPv6 are much appreciated.

-- 
/"\  Best regards,                      | mlaier at freebsd.org
\ /  Max Laier                          | ICQ #67774661
 X   http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/  | mlaier at EFnet
/ \  ASCII Ribbon Campaign              | Against HTML Mail and News
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20060219/c6b4b373/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list