[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

[Harti Brandt]

On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:

DS>Scott Long <scottl at samsco.org> writes:
DS>> I've been trying to reproduce this on my local hardware, but I can't
DS>> trigger it.
DS>
DS>The ISP driver abuses the inline keyword.  As I told mjacob earlier,
DS>the extensive inlining not only breaks the build, but probably hurts
DS>performance as well.
DS>
DS>(what gcc is complaining about, specifically, is that expanding calls
DS>to inlined functions causes isp_target_notify() to grow by more than
DS>100%)

The interesting point is: why does it build on my real sparc (2-UII CPUs, 
512MByte memory), but not on the tinderbox. Is there something about the 
crosscompiler that is different?

harti