GENERIC and DEFAULTS
Pete Slagle
freebsd-stable at box559.com
Mon Oct 31 15:47:29 PST 2005
>>i agree 100%, i hate wizardy/black-magic, and this 'fix' falls in that
>>class. Why was a 5ton hammer used to fix non existing problem?
>>a small comment like 'you better keep these lines to make X happy'
>>would have sufficed.
>
>
> You've clearly never spent much time on the FreeBSD support forums,
> where every few days someone posts for help
>
> 1) with an error caused by removing one of those "Do not remove this!"
> lines, and
>
> 2) for help on getting X working when they forgot to add /dev/io and
> /dev/mem to their kernel.
>
> Those of us who spend a lot of time answering such questions will
> surely welcome the change, since it will hopefully reduce our
> workload.
Abundant thanks and sympathy are due to the generous souls that staff
the support forums. That said, it is far from clear that ease-of-use
considerations are the most important factor.
Freedom to not have the O/S second guess one's choices, or worse,
silently override them, is one of the main differentiators between
FreeBSD and other available operating systems. Many (most?) of us are
here because we do not want excessive complexity and hand holding. Let's
not give away the fundamental character of FreeBSD in an (undoubtedly
futile) attempt to make it idiot-proof.
This is a small case in itself, but it represents a much larger issue
concerning future direction.
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list