GENERIC and DEFAULTS
Roland Smith
rsmith at xs4all.nl
Sun Oct 30 23:26:35 PST 2005
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 03:22:09PM -0800, Pete Slagle wrote:
> >>I've seen that 'GENERIC' file has been modified, moving some lines to
> >>'DEFAULTS':
> >>
> >>device isa
> >>
> >>device mem # Memory and kernel memory devices
> >>device io # I/O device
> >>
> >>Why?
> >>What does it mean? Should we include 'DEFAULTS' in our customized
> >>'GENERIC'?
> >>Or those lines are no more mandatory?
> >>
> >
> >No, you don't need to include 'DEFAULTS', config(8) will take care of
> >that for you.
> >
> >http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200510271713.j9RHDNTo013082
> >
> >AFAICT, this was done in order to automatically include devices which
> >are essential in most cases so less experienced users won't accidentally
> >break their systems and later complain that e.g. X doesn't work anymore.
>
> The whole mechanism seems like an obvious POLA violation. All the more
> so without a note in UPDATING.
Agreed. A heads-up in the beginning of GENERIC would also be nice.
> Personally, I prefer less automated "help." In general, it might be
> better to encourage those who need a nanny to run Windows, leaving
> FreeBSD unencumbered for those who don't. IMHO.
HMO exactly. Spreading the kernel configuration over two different files
that interact in a non-obvious way is a PITA. Do I now have to create
two files to build a custom kernel? Let's keep it simple and stick to
one kernel config file, please.
Roland
--
R.F.Smith (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/) Please send e-mail as plain text.
public key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20051031/5e677ccb/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list