Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (nbench results)
Bohdan Horst
nexus at hoth.amu.edu.pl
Tue May 24 13:56:19 PDT 2005
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 01:21:19PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:17:01PM +0200, Bohdan Horst wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 12:37:08PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > >
>
> OK, it might be trustable..but you're still testing gcc 2/gcc 3 as
> pointed out by another poster. If you use the same 4.x binaries on
> both machines it might be better.
NUMERIC SORT: 4.11= 499.52 494.31 5.4= 451.26 449.7 5.4O= 491.66 492.53
STRING SORT: 4.11= 24.13 24.11 5.4= 25.286 25.294 5.4O= 24.206 24.213
BITFIELD(e+8) 4.11= 1.133 1.1319 5.4= 1.1239 1.1239 5.4O= 1.1358 1.1358
FP EMULATION 4.11= 18.951 18.755 5.4= 25.044 25.029 5.4O= 18.818 18.818
FOURIER 4.11= 5361 5356.3 5.4= 5076.3 5076.3 5.4O= 5577 5577
ASSIGNMENT 4.11= 5.4795 5.4469 5.4= 5.8986 5.8968 5.4O= 5.481 5.4763
IDEA 4.11= 595.23 592.13 5.4= 660.65 660.65 5.4O= 593.91 593.83
HUFFMAN 4.11= 332.47 330.91 5.4= 409.06 408.95 5.4O= 333.16 333.16
NEURAL NET 4.11= 7.0374 6.9882 5.4= 7.2976 7.2955 5.4O= 7.033 7.0201
LU DECOMP. 4.11= 225.94 226.76 5.4= 211.56 210.84 5.4O= 219.41 220.15
original:
INTEGER INDEX 4.11= 12.305 12.238 5.4= 13.409 13.400 5.4O= 12.275 12.277
FLOATING-POINT 4.11= 9.309 9.296 5.4= 9.052 9.041 5.4O= 9.339 9.344
new:
MEMORY INDEX 4.11= 3.321 3.313 5.4= 3.448 3.448 5.4O= 3.328 3.327
INTEGER INDEX 4.11= 2.895 2.873 5.4= 3.271 3.268 5.4O= 2.878 2.880
FLOATING-POINT 4.11= 5.163 5.156 5.4= 5.020 5.014 5.4O= 5.180 5.182
(5.4O == 4.11 binary on 5.4R)
almost identical speed :)
regards
--
Bohdan 'Nexus' Horst
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list