gmirror
Vladimir Dzhivsanoff
vohand at gmail.com
Sat May 14 07:00:44 PDT 2005
On 5/14/05, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 01:22:05PM +0400, vohand at gmail.com wrote:
> +>
> +> Hardware: SATA RAID adapter with SiliconImage 3114 chip. 2 SATA HDD.
> +> I did gmirror.
> +>
> +> Run test:
> +> 3 parallel tasks "dd if=/dev/mirror/gm0 of=/dev/null bs=1m count=5000"
> +>
> +> gstat shows summary read speed from mirror about 30-40 mbyte/sec.
> +> It is for all balance algorithms: load, round-robin, split
> +>
> +> While, one "dd if=/dev/ad4 of=/dev/null bs=1m count=5000" shows 50
> mbyte/sec
> +>
> +> 1. Why it occurs and how fix it ?
> +>
> +> 2. If in the test instead of three instancies of "dd if=/dev/mirror/gm0
> +> of=/dev/null bs=1m count=5000" run only one,
> +> then read speed don`t exceeds read speed from one disk (dd
> if=/dev/ad4
> +> of=/dev/null bs=1m count=5000)
> +> a) This is gmirror feature ?
> +> b) This is hardware feature (SiliconImage 3114 chip) ?
>
> This is the way RAID1 works. Try to imagine how disk's heads are moving -
> there will be no speed-up in sequential reads, this is not RAID0.
>
> Mirror characteristics are:
> - the same speed for sequential reads as for one disk;
> - the same speed for sequential/random write as for one disk;
========================================================
> - double speed of one disk for random reads;
by what test-suite I can test it ?
and what balance algorithm is more proper for random reads ?
three parallel tasks of "dd ...." is not good model for random reads ?
>
> --
> Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl
> pjd at FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org
> FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!
>
>
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list