libc.so.4 & libc_r.so.4 in ices0

Kevin S. Brackett ksb at platypusgroup.com
Fri Jun 24 04:42:40 GMT 2005


On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Dan Nelson wrote:

> In the last episode (Jun 23), Kevin S. Brackett said:
>>       libc.so.4 => /usr/lib/libc.so.4 (0x28755000)
>>       libc_r.so.4 => /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4 (0x287ee000)
>>
>> any ideas why it's doing this, and what the fix is?
>
> Looks fine to me:
>
>        libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5 (0x2875c000)
>        libpthread.so.1 => /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1 (0x28836000)
>
> Is this a machine recently upgraded from 4.*?  Does "ldd -a ices"
> indicate that those libs are being pulled in as dependencies of another
> library?  If so, rebuild that port, then rebuild ices.
>
> Here is a script to find all the binaries linked to superceded port
> libs and libs directly linked to threads libs:
>
> #! /bin/sh
> ( find -s /usr/local/lib /usr/X11R6/lib -name "lib*.so"
>  find -s /usr/local/bin /usr/X11R6/bin/
> ) |
> xargs ldd -a 2>/dev/null |
> awk '
>  /^[^\t]/ { cmd=$1 }
>  /^\t.*\/compat\// { printf "%s\t%s\n",cmd,$3 }
>  /^\t(libc_r|libpthread|libthr).so/ { printf "%s\t%s\n",cmd,$3 }
> '

Well, the problem is when libc and libc_r are linked together, I 
recompiled without -lc and it's now fine, but not really what i'd consider 
a great fix...


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list