4.11 vs. 5.4 stablity

[Iulian M]

On Wednesday 27 July 2005 01:58, Benjamin Lutz wrote:
> Eriq wrote:
> > I am running 4.11 on a dual amd box and have found it solid as a rock
> > for running apache2, postgres, dns and postfix. But now I am thinking
> > of upgrading. I wonder if 5.4 is as stable  for these servers that
> > must run 24/7. And is it worth all the trouble to do, I have grown
> > pretty lazy :)

The bad part about an rock stable system that works flawlessly is that as an 
admin you do become lazy ... very lazy :). You should not change the os on 
the server, at least not before testing (and learning) 5.X/6.X non critical 
systems.

-- 
Accuracy, n.:
	The vice of being right
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050727/4e6148cb/attachment.bin