dangerous situation with shutdown process

Oliver Fromme olli at lurza.secnetix.de
Mon Jul 18 13:02:48 GMT 2005


Kevin Oberman <oberman at es.net> wrote:
 > [...]
 > I believe that the Windows solution to this problem is to put a really,
 > really long delay between when the system is finished syncing and when
 > the power is turned off.

Definitely not.  When I compare Windows XP and FreeBSD on
the same hardware (notebook with ATA disk), then Windows'
shutdown process is a lot faster than FreeBSD's.  In fact,
when I shut it down under XP for the first time, the power
was off so quickly that I thought someting must have gone
wrong.  But everything was OK and normal.

 > This might be the best solution for FreeBSD, as
 > well, but it will irritate people.

It is already irritating that FreeBSD sits there doing
nothing for ~ 5 seconds before turning power off.  Windows
doesn't do that.  (Yes I know, there's a sysctl for that,
but I suspect that it's not save to modify it in FreeBSD.)

Best regards
   Oliver

-- 
Oliver Fromme,  secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing
Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author
and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way.

"Emacs ist für mich kein Editor. Für mich ist das genau das gleiche, als
wenn ich nach einem Fahrrad (für die Sonntagbrötchen) frage und einen
pangalaktischen Raumkreuzer mit 10 km Gesamtlänge bekomme. Ich weiß nicht,
was ich damit soll." -- Frank Klemm, de.comp.os.unix.discussion


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list