background_fsck=no does not work?

Kris Kennaway kris at
Mon Apr 25 11:13:38 PDT 2005

On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 08:10:35AM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
> >> not always be clean.  Softupdates (hopefully) means that it will be
> >> consistent and recoverable, but what you're seeing here is normal and
> > Why "hopefully"?  Aren't people convinced that it works correctly?
> i am convinced, but some of the hosts seem not to be :-)
> i see shutdowns which 0 0 0 0 and then shut, and when restarted
> single user and fscked manually show errors.  though i think this
> may be in current, which is on most of my hosts.

Yeah, others have reported this problem on -current, but 5.x does not
have it.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list