5.4-prerelease - hanging under load
Christian Brueffer
chris at unixpages.org
Sun Apr 3 14:18:33 PDT 2005
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 07:02:16PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote:
> Emanuel Strobl wrote:
>
> >Huh? I thought by default it is "HIGH", but it would also explain the
> >experiences in the thread "cpufreq related RELENG_5 regression"
> >(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=389949+393881+/usr/local/www/db/text/2005/freebsd-stable/20050327.freebsd-stable)
>
> But does that also affect desktop machines? I'm not under the
> impression that my CPU is running at a lower frequency. The issue
> I mentioned only seems to occur when doing larger block reads/writes
> from/to disk (SATA), like untarring firefox. I didn't notice it
> so far when some kind of mixed disk access is going on, like with
> find, compiling, etc. Maybe that points to some locking issues in
> the VM corner? I mean, it's not dramatic, but still makes the
> system appear a bit unpolished, when it happens. In the past, with
> pre-5.x releases, FreeBSD has been scheduling disk i/o and interactive
> work smoothly, in my experience, so one didn't quite notice when
> heavy disk access was going on, at least not if your interactive
> programs weren't doing much disk i/o themselves.
>
Not sure about desktop machines, probably depends on what exactly you're
doing. At least it affects real-world scenarios, see my original message
to this list:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-March/013036.html
- Christian
--
Christian Brueffer chris at unixpages.org brueffer at FreeBSD.org
GPG Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc
GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050403/bcbb5105/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list