standard-supfile = stable-supfile with 5.3 ?

Ken Smith kensmith at cse.Buffalo.EDU
Tue Nov 9 17:40:37 PST 2004


On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 06:40:38PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote:

> stable-supfile is correct then; we just need to correct the README.

How about this patch for src/share/examples/cvsup/README on RELENG_5
(will become FreeBSD 5.4):

Index: README
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/share/examples/cvsup/README,v
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -r1.18 README
--- README	30 Jul 2002 14:08:16 -0000	1.18
+++ README	10 Nov 2004 01:37:36 -0000
@@ -5,13 +5,16 @@
 with CVSup version 14.0 or later.  For general information on CVSup
 itself, please see http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/cvsup.html
 
-To maintain the sources for the FreeBSD-current release, use:
+To track the Errata/Security fixes for this version of the FreeBSD-stable
+release, use:
 
     standard-supfile		Main source tree
 
     ports-supfile		Ports collection
 
-To maintain the sources for the FreeBSD-stable release, use:
+To track the sources for the Development Branch of this FreeBSD-stable
+release (not recommended unless you read the freebsd-stable at FreeBSD.ORG
+mailing list), use:
 
     stable-supfile		Main source tree
 


-- 
						Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to      |       kensmith at cse.buffalo.edu
  there, funny things are everywhere.   |
                      - Theodore Geisel |


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list