HEADSUP!!! USB MFC committed..

Garance A Drosihn drosih at rpi.edu
Mon Mar 1 10:11:52 PST 2004


At 3:42 PM +1100 3/1/04, Christopher Vance wrote:
>On Sun, Feb 29, 2004, Richard Coleman wrote:
>>Keeping the code bases closer together will probably make
>>development easier, not harder.  Also, this USB code will
>>now be tested on more hardware before the release of 4.10
>>or 5.3.  ...
>>
>>Seems like a win/win to me.
>
>Okay: that leaves me a happy little vegemite.  :-)
>
>[I had just been growing concerned that 5-STABLE was slipping
>into the next decade...]

Well, I can say that there are a lot of developers who are very
interested in getting 5.x-STABLE going, if for no other reason
than we can start work on the next set of really-major changes.
We can't start on 6.0-current until there's a 5.x-stable, and
at this point 5.x-current is pretty much off-limits for really
major (disruptive) changes.

So, we really do understand your interest in getting a 5.x-stable.
It is very likely that 5.3-release will be the start of the stable
branch.  We are probably not ready to make a public promise about
that just yet, but certainly a lot of developers have their own
private vows that "this is going to be it!".

-- 
Garance Alistair Drosehn            =   gad at gilead.netel.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer           or  gad at freebsd.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute    or  drosih at rpi.edu


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list