FreeBSD Eol's?
Roman Neuhauser
neuhauser at chello.cz
Mon Apr 26 01:58:12 PDT 2004
# colin.percival at wadham.ox.ac.uk / 2004-04-24 14:39:57 +0100:
> At 14:22 24/04/2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >4.8 passed its expiry date and was extended. 4.9 will probably be
> >extended at a later date too.
>
> Looks like Kris got a bit confused here. :-)
>
> The idea behind the extended support branches is that *selected*
> releases will be supported for at least 24 months; this allows us to
> offer extended support to people who can't upgrade on a regular basis,
> while keeping the number of supported branches to a manageable level.
> We haven't yet decided which future branches will qualify for
> extended support, but it is quite unlikely that this set would include
> FreeBSD 4.9.
How are the extended-support branches chosen?
--
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list