Sparc64 doesn't care about you, and you shouldn't care about Sparc64
michelle at sorbs.net
Sun Nov 8 18:43:41 UTC 2015
Sean Bruno wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> On 11/06/15 01:18, alexmcwhirter at triadic.us wrote:
>> So is the problem in question the lack of being able to use
>> clang/llvm? Or that newer hardware is unsupported? sparc64 supports
>> sun4u which is most boxes, Fujitsu Sparc64 boxes also work quite
>> well. The only thing really missing is sun4v and a few drivers here
>> and there. OpenBSD has support for almost all of the newer
>> Sun/Oracle boxes, which shouldn't bee too hard to port over.
>> Because of the lack of sun4v support i have moved over to a custom
>> illumos distro, but one of the things im working on there is to
>> replace gcc with clang/llvm. If it means saving the sparc64 port i
>> will gladly move some of my work over to freebsd.
> problem 1. the base clang/llvm doesn't support the FreeBSD sparc64
> target. This needs work, and hey, if someone wants to spend the time
> to get things working, great. Let's move on it and modernize the target.
> problem 2. lack of development hardware in the FreeBSD project. I'm
> not asking for people to buy the FreeBSD project 10-15 year old sparc
> hardware and send it to us. We don't want it. If there is a push to
> modernize support for Sparc machines, we can talk about aquiring new
> machines and racking them up as reference boxes. If there are people
> interested in modernizing CPU support, by all means, move forward and
> do it. Don't let me stop you.
I would like to see it continue on sun4u, as I still have a load of sun4u boxes - quite capable boxes - and some that people can develop on if you want (I cannot code myself on Sun except for generic stuff in C so I'd not be much help on that front.)
More information about the freebsd-sparc64