svn commit: r270201 - in head/sys: powerpc/include sys
craig001 at lerwick.hopto.org
Fri Aug 22 18:52:47 UTC 2014
On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 11:27 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 08:02:38AM +0000, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > Author: kib
> > Date: Wed Aug 20 08:02:38 2014
> > New Revision: 270201
> > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/270201
> > Log:
> > Add arch-specific macro SFBUF_PHYS_DMAP(), which should translate the
> > physical address of the page to direct map address, in case
> > SFBUF_OPTIONAL_DIRECT_MAP returns true. The case of PowerPC AIM
> > 64bit, where the page physical address is identical to the direct map
> > address, is accidental.
> Real use of this interposer is for sparc64 machines which can use direct
> map due to usable cache implementation.
> Could someone with the machine identified as SPARC64V test the following
> patch ? Just booting multiuser should be enough.
> diff --git a/sys/sparc64/include/vmparam.h b/sys/sparc64/include/vmparam.h
> index 8e7d76c..c2f30c3 100644
> --- a/sys/sparc64/include/vmparam.h
> +++ b/sys/sparc64/include/vmparam.h
> @@ -241,5 +241,8 @@ extern vm_offset_t vm_max_kernel_address;
> #define SFBUF
> #define SFBUF_MAP
> +#define SFBUF_OPTIONAL_DIRECT_MAP dcache_color_ignore
> +#include <machine/tlb.h>
> +#define SFBUF_PHYS_DMAP(x) TLB_PHYS_TO_DIRECT(x)
> #endif /* !_MACHINE_VMPARAM_H_ */
What machines are identified as SPARC64V ?? our collection only
identifies as sparc64.
I think the sun4v code got sin binned, AFAIK the sun4u identifies as
just plain sparc64.
More information about the freebsd-sparc64