Error: Illegal operands: There are only 32 single precision f
obrien at freebsd.org
Fri Jan 21 16:25:59 PST 2005
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 03:30:22PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 06:27:47PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 11:22:25PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 01:33:12PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 12:37:21PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 03:00:05PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > > > A number of ports are failing on sparc64 with the following error:
> > > > > > Error: Illegal operands: There are only 32 single precision f registers; [0-31]
> > ..
> > > > > The patch at:
> > > > > http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/opcodes/sparc-opc.c.diff?r1=1.9&r2=1.10&cvsroot=src
> > > > > fixes these and doesn't break world. Binutils 2.15 were branched with
> > > > > rev. 1.9 of sparc-opc.c so I think it's fairly safe to import rev. 1.10
> > > > > onto the vendor branch in FreeBSD.
> > > >
> > > > Any progress in getting this fixed in FreeBSD?
> > > No, no reply or reaction from David so far.
> > I didn't see this until now (no PR filed :-( ). I just merged the FSF
> > mainline fix into the FSF 2.15 repo. I've created a patch to test that
> > updates src/contrib/binutils to the top of the FSF 2.15 tree.
> Can we get the patch referenced above committed to FreeBSD? As you
> know, the binutils update you sent me was broken, but applying only
> the redhat patch fixed the problem, and I still have it in my sparc64
> source trees so that packages can be built.
I never heard that the Red Hat version of the patch fixed your problems.
I need to investigate the differences as the patch I sent you is what is
in the real binutils CVS and what will get committed to FreeBSD soon.
-- David (obrien at FreeBSD.org)
More information about the freebsd-sparc64