syscons on U10 /w Creator

[Rich Hampton]

Kris Kennaway wrote:

>On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 09:15:00PM -0700, Rich Hampton wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Of course, I didn't think that had anything to do with it but when the 
>>order was exactly as above, the compile finished without error.  So 
>>then, I went back to the original order and recompiled again and it 
>>finished without error.  I don't know what's going on at this point.  I 
>>think I had the uart before sc, or something to that effect.
>>    
>>
>
>Hmm, that's pretty weird..I didn't think the order of entries mattered
>in kernel configurations.
>
>Kris
>
I didn't think so either, and I still don't.  Maybe it's just my week 
for weirdness....but then again, I screwed with it so many times this 
week I really can't remember exactly what I did.

By the way, is puc really necessary here?  I thought that had to do with 
i386 bios issues.

Rich