syscons on U10 /w Creator
rich at hamptonhouse.org
Wed Jan 14 20:33:58 PST 2004
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 09:15:00PM -0700, Rich Hampton wrote:
>>Of course, I didn't think that had anything to do with it but when the
>>order was exactly as above, the compile finished without error. So
>>then, I went back to the original order and recompiled again and it
>>finished without error. I don't know what's going on at this point. I
>>think I had the uart before sc, or something to that effect.
>Hmm, that's pretty weird..I didn't think the order of entries mattered
>in kernel configurations.
I didn't think so either, and I still don't. Maybe it's just my week
for weirdness....but then again, I screwed with it so many times this
week I really can't remember exactly what I did.
By the way, is puc really necessary here? I thought that had to do with
i386 bios issues.
More information about the freebsd-sparc64