64-bit time_t snapshot?

[David O'Brien]

On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 04:46:53PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
> If this is worth doing, any thoughts on whether it would be best to
> base it on 5.2.1-RELEASE (plus just the time_t change) or would it
> be better to try and catch a -current that seems stable?  The release

Definately a -current.  So much has changed since RELENG_5_2 was first
branched, that 5.2.1-RELEASE is too much of a downgrade.  Especially with
the latest threading changes.