Hyperthreading Issues (on Athlon64?)
JoaoBR
joao at matik.com.br
Tue Oct 10 16:15:24 PDT 2006
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 16:43, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 October 2006 14:55, JoaoBR wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 October 2006 15:11, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > > My dmesg does not have the line about "Hyperthreading: 2 logical
> > > > CPUs", though. But I had been pretty sure the Athlon64 chips didn't
> > > > have any hyperthreading support. Why is the HTT there?
> >
> > HTT is NOT hyperthreading, HT is and HT does not exist on AMD64
>
> Err, no. The HTT there stands for HyperThreading Technology.
you say it right: "stands for" in this case
But I think it "is" the other way round, in terms of abreviation:
HTT = Hyper Transport Technology
HT = Hyper Threading (Technology)
http://download.intel.com/design/Pentium4/manuals/24896613.pdf
If believe Intel came up with HyperThreading after AMD brought up the term HTT
and so there was no way to call it HTT but "HT Technology" but this story may
be wrong.
Unluckily (my opinion) in freebsd's i386 kernel (read NOTES) HT technology is
called HTT CPU.
Even if this is certainly ok for whom knows it, then an AMD X2 is definitly
not a hyperthreaded processor but has 2 cores as well as Intel's newer Core
Duo, so HTT for an AMD X2 would be wrong (my opinion again)
on AMD DualCore you see
Cores per package: 2 <<<<<<<
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs
cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0
cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1
on P4 HT you see
Logical CPUs per core: 2 <<<<<<<
ACPI APIC Table: <INTEL PRODUCT8>
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs
cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0
cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1
what then at the end is correct but it does not correct the logic error :
HT or HTT is the question but at the end AMD is not HTT, whatever HT or HTT
then is or stands for
--
João
A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
More information about the freebsd-smp
mailing list