Replacing BIND with unbound

[Chris Rees]

On 9 July 2012 16:16, Mark Felder <feld at feld.me> wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 05:39:37 -0500, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des at des.no> wrote:
>
>> What sort of benchmarks do you envision?  Unlike named, unbound is
>> intended to serve only one client (localhost) or a small number of
>> clients (a SOHO).
>
>
> Highly disagree; we use it (ISP) as our resolving nameserver for all of our
> customers.

As Doug has pointed out, you can always get BIND from a port; not
every installation requires a heavyweight resolver.

Chris