PAM modules -> LDAP!

[Fahad Ahmad]

Not everybody requires LDAP/PAM , so making it part of base is not a 
valid reason.
Same can apply for any other 3rd party port (Apache,Samba,etc etc).



On 09/17/2011 05:30 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 09/16/11 23:36, Mike Carlson wrote:
>> On 09/16/2011 08:05 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>>> We currently have a number of PAM modules in ports, and while some of
>>> them are specific to certain third-party software, many aren't.  I
>>> believe we would benefit from importing at least some of these into
>>> base.  My question is: which ones?
>>>
>>> DES
>> LDAP support out of the box would be fantastic.
>>
>> Mike C
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-security at freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>> "freebsd-security-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> Also a strong vote for LDAP support. LDAP is our backend for several
> server systems and it is a kind of pain
> having to think first for the ports to be installed. Also I suspect and
> hope a better integration if LDAP gets
> part of the core system.
>
> Regards,
> Oliver
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-security at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"