ruby 1.8.7p358 and ruby 1.9.0p125
Steve Wills
swills at FreeBSD.org
Sat Feb 18 09:06:19 UTC 2012
On 02/17/12 08:20, Steve Wills wrote:
> On 02/16/12 23:51, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:36:14 -0500
>> Steve Wills <swills at FreeBSD.org> mentioned:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> If anyone is interested in trying the updated ruby 1.8.7p358 or ruby
>>> 1.9.3p125 which were both released today, I have a patch here:
>>>
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165223
>>>
>>> Builds fine and passes tests, and as you can see in the PR, there is an
>>> exp-run requested for it, but extra testing won't hurt.
>>>
>>
>> Which tests?
>>
>> Does it pass the rubyspec regression test suite? Did you look at possible
>> regression in rubyspec compared to the previous release?
>>
>
> Just the tests that are run by "make test" in the build dir after
> building is done. If there's a better way, let me know.
>
For the record, I finally found these tests and ran them. I had to set
sysctl kern.chroot_allow_open_directories=2 to get past the chroot
errors, which cleared up a lot of the initial huge batch of failures.
Then I ended up with this for 1.9.3p125:
3483 files, 18247 examples, 153913 expectations, 0 failures, 37 errors
as compared to the results for 1.9.3p0:
3483 files, 18231 examples, 154206 expectations, 0 failures, 37 errors
So I think it seems OK. Haven't looked at 1.8.7p358 yet, but it's a much
smaller change set so I'm much less worried about it.
Steve
More information about the freebsd-ruby
mailing list