ruby 1.9 update patch

[Steve Wills]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thanks for the feedback!

I was attempting to do some run time testing of this and stumbled upon a
strange issue. It seems that even without my patch (and with it too), if
you do this:

cd /usr/ports/databases/ruby-bdb
env RUBY_VER=1.9 make install

on a system without any ruby, it will install Ruby 1.9, then fail to
install the databases/ruby-bdb port since there will not be a "rdoc"
binary installed, but only "rdoc19". My patch doesn't make this worse,
but it doesn't help it either. Should I try to solve this and if so how?

Steve

On 05/19/11 16:56, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> On 05/19/11 02:02, Steve Wills wrote:
> The diff, and suggested progression seem rational and right to me. I've
> only read the diff though, not tried it.
> 
>> gems and rake from ports for Ruby 1.9, just like we do for 1.8. This is
>> needed because some gems need the newer gems and rake.
>>
>> - From there, making Ruby 1.9 default will be as simple as
>> finding/fixing/marking the rest of the things that don't work with it,
>> then flipping the default in bsd.ruby.mk.
>>
>> Any comments would be appreciated!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Steve
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN3O3tAAoJEPXPYrMgexuhsFwIAKUd5HguUoNLG7hjE34YgvQ2
nlKirRYofGFDLy/dEqo5DQkhG5NmrK3yZ7DueZN/Ykcd0HZnVwVS+gR+n9++Cvt5
uVw8MuA8B8/Ye/of/eTvj8jIcPZ5AUwMfjCE2qWYlrnj+6yxTX4JTf+8yz7bGi67
guv2W+1zSQw8Q1NRFaydqUi2Sw3DqDGgvT+sZGgLmTsOBFEpG3QTo3t6ZGbwv7uY
zm3hypQv7NuC7twkbwTh5mgP6ro9S24Un47pa9Dy1BCJcsO3aBImApQ7lR6exwRC
IP5dC+FMIvb37neqlMug663a2NpF5fq3SOBxHE4/BkB6imT/FNamIZQlmXe30T8=
=/5wl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----