mountlate being too mount-happy

[Hiroki Sato]

Chris Rees <utisoft at gmail.com> wrote
  in <CADLo839wqzAPenuQDOVpQ74yjCMkPQNceKpvs_N9XNwMLrkC1A at mail.gmail.com>:

ut> On 2 November 2012 14:21, Eitan Adler <lists at eitanadler.com> wrote:
ut> > On 2 November 2012 09:56, Chris Rees <utisoft at gmail.com> wrote:
ut> >> I'll take a look.
ut> >
ut> > untested:
ut>
ut> Based on Eitan's patch, I've tested this one, and documented it in mount(8) too:
ut>
ut> http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/mountonlylate.diff
ut>
ut> Does anyone have any suggestions/objections/urge to approve it?

 Is the original problem due to backgrounding of NFS mount only?  If
 so, implementing prevention of duplicate invocation into mount(8)
 would be more reasonable, I think.

-- Hiroki
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-rc/attachments/20121118/f0a30390/attachment.sig>