Bumping a pet bug

[Kostik Belousov]

On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 11:43:06PM +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
> I think in most cases if devfs mount fails you will likely not end up 
> with a jail where you can do much... rather many things expect /dev/null 
> etc.
> 
> It is possible to just disable the devfs mount completely for a jail if 
> you want the jail to start up anyway without devfs so I think it would 
> be OK to simply skip the jail if we cannot mount devfs - and complain 
> loudly.
> 
> Anybody have any cases where this would be a problem?
Just curious. Why devfs mounts can fail ?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-rc/attachments/20120122/2d546cdd/attachment.pgp