zfs newbie
Dan Langille
dan at langille.org
Tue Sep 14 17:06:03 UTC 2021
DTD wrote on 9/7/21 5:51 PM:
> Following the default 12.2 zfs install I got one pool (zroot) and a
> dataset for each of the traditional mount points. So zfs list shows:
>
> NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
> zroot 279G 6.75T 88K /zroot
> zroot/ROOT 1.74G 6.75T 88K none
> zroot/ROOT/default 1.74G 6.75T 1.74G /
> zroot/tmp 176K 6.75T 176K /tmp
> zroot/usr 277G 6.75T 88K /usr
> zroot/usr/home 276G 6.75T 276G /usr/home
> zroot/usr/ports 88K 6.75T 88K /usr/ports
> zroot/usr/src 670M 6.75T 670M /usr/src
> zroot/var 47.5M 6.75T 88K /var
> zroot/var/audit 88K 6.75T 88K /var/audit
> zroot/var/crash 88K 6.75T 88K /var/crash
> zroot/var/log 820K 6.75T 820K /var/log
> zroot/var/mail 46.3M 6.75T 46.3M /var/mail
> zroot/var/tmp 88K 6.75T 88K /var/tmp
>
> I had consultant configure another service for us. He set up the disk
> array with one dataset. so zfs list on this system give:
>
> NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
> zroot 2.65G 13.2T 2.62G legacy
>
> From a sysadmin view I rather like the multiple datasets. Are there
> advantages to one over the other?
I see no advantages to me in the single dataset.
What do you see from zpool status? I'm wondering if this is not directly
on hardware, such as a VM under VMware.
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list