redesignde the unix-like system directory

[Aryeh Friedman]

Why redesign something that is not broken (and if redesigned would break
many things)?   The directory structure Unix (and by extensions Unix-like
OS's) was designed to be the most generally useful one out there (designed
by evolution) and changing it would break many applications.

On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 8:30 AM kindu smith <malaizhichun at tom.com> wrote:

> Borrowing android and freebsd just to keep it simple:
>
> /app, application directory, various system-level applications
> /boot,  boot directory, set up ABI, API, EFI, kernel, modules and other
> directories to store complete microkernel boot source code, interface,
> EFI partition information, modules.
> /cloud, various cloud applications
> /data,  database, such as key, web page data
> /help,  operating system manual
> /net,  network information and server information, etc.
> /system , store the file system hierarchy (FHS) directory
> /user,  user directory, set user account and information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>


-- 
Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org