freebsd vs. netbsd
freebsd at edvax.de
Mon Jun 8 04:36:26 UTC 2020
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 12:07:08 +0800, Wesley wrote:
> On 2020/6/8 上午 11:14, Polytropon wrote:
> >> what are their use scenes then?
> > Oversimplified: NetBSD is the candidate for "runs everywhere",
> > so it's very useful for embedded systems and "strange" hardware
> > platforms; OpenBSD has security as primary goal, that makes it
> > perfect for servers; FreeBSD is also used for embedded, servers,
> > and desktops. In an attempt to summarize, all the BSDs can be
> > used for almost everything - from embedded, to laptops, desktops,
> > servers, and "combined forms". In reality, you_will_ find BSDs
> > in all those places, and you will also find them in places where
> > you don't know there is a BSD running, for example in routers,
> > managed switches, NAS, WLAN APs, firewall and other networking
> > appliances. They are also used as development platforms for a
> > lot of other systems.
> Thank you so much Polytropon.
> Do these three have difference on package management?
Yes. They use their own package creation and distribution
system. However, those systems work "somewhat similar".
The you use are of course a bit different, but technically,
they aim to achieve the same goals.
The system TrueOS, ex PC-BSD, derived from FreeBSD, had its
own format: PBI = push button install, which was a kind of
"everything in one file -> into one subdirectory".
> For example, Ubuntu use apt, Centos use yum for package management.
> Though their main purpose are similar, but usage is different.
Exactly. The same applies for the BSDs.
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
More information about the freebsd-questions