freebsd should be rewritten based on microkernel architecture
ottavio2006-usenet2012 at yahoo.com
Sat Apr 18 13:23:18 UTC 2020
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 at 12:56, Jacques Foucry <jacques+freebsd at foucry.net> wrote:
> Or GhostBSD which have all those « funny » things. A gui installer, a gui
> pacќega manager, use networkManager, etc.
> Pretty good for a desktop. Be carefull it's run on STABLE.
> This NOT an OS for *BSD sysadmin which will tune the OS, but to start using
> BSD like Linux, it's a good way.
You're painting a picture of Linux (which is not an OS but a kernel)
as if it was the ultimate eye-candy, graphics-fanboi OS, which is not.
Under the hood, it can be as arcane and obscure as any old-school Unix
clones. Outside the *BSD bubble, 99% of IT end users regard Linux as
"the" difficult OS. Some people find Windows 10 difficult. Some people
find using an Android smartphone difficult. Yes, we may think they are
stupid but they are the ones who pay our wages.
Just slap Mate, KDE or Gnome on any OS and it will make it more
More information about the freebsd-questions