freebsd should be rewritten based on microkernel architecture
dalescott at shaw.ca
Sat Apr 18 04:57:32 UTC 2020
> From: "Aryeh Friedman" <aryeh.friedman at gmail.com>
> To: "Dale Scott" <dalescott at shaw.ca>
> Cc: "Polytropon" <freebsd at edvax.de>, "Paul Pathiakis" <pathiaki2 at yahoo.com>,
> "freebsd-questions" <freebsd-questions at freebsd.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 6:50:09 PM
> Subject: Re: freebsd should be rewritten based on microkernel architecture
> ...anything that makes it hard or impossible to charge for the work (see below)
> is an immediate non-starter.
It's also generally not legal to profit from committing a crime.
> ...clauses 5 and 6 of the OSD ( [ https://opensource.org/osd-annotated |
> https://opensource.org/osd-annotated ] ) such restrictions are by definition
> not open source.
If you say so, but the OSI is only an industry association and the OSD only their opinion.
> Correct but you're focusing on the wrong details and misreading the ones you do
> focus on.
Wouldn't that depend on what's important to me?
P.S. there seems to be something wrong with the Petitecloud source tarball download.
More information about the freebsd-questions