ruby 2.4.7,1 considered vulnerable?

MJ mafsys1234 at
Sat Aug 31 09:08:56 UTC 2019

On 31/08/2019 6:14 pm, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 17:43+1000, MJ wrote:
>> Given the liberal use of portepoch in the package versions I expect
>> the maintainer has got confused. Indeed perhaps it's the portepoch
>> that's causing the issue. Perhaps contact the maintainer to get it
>> worked through?
> I just created PR 240227:

Good stuff.

I just looked at the Ruby website.

The way the version numbers jump around in Ruby, I'm not surprised about this.


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list