Issues replacing a failed disk in a zfs pool

[Matthew Pounsett]

On 13 September 2018 at 16:28, Matthew Pounsett <matt at conundrum.com> wrote:

> I just tried bringing the disk back online, and zfs now says it's being
> resilvered.  I assume it's going to take longer to complete than I'm going
> to be here, so the replacement will now probably have to wait for my next
> visit.
>
> That went very quickly.  That 'spare-4' replacement line now looks like
this:

    spare-4                       ONLINE       0     0     0
      diskid/DISK-PK2331PAG704VT  ONLINE       0     0     0  block size:
512B configured, 4096B native
      da23                        ONLINE       0     0     0  block size:
512B configured, 4096B native

 I'm not sure what I'm meant to do here.  da23 is a spare that was brought
in to replace DISK-PK2331PAG704VT when it failed, but they now seem to be
joined at the hip.