upgrade of an iSCSI zpool mirror
julien at perdition.city
Thu Jun 14 14:28:24 UTC 2018
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 02:53:25PM +0100, Frank Leonhardt wrote:
> On 2018-06-11 14:04, Julien Cigar wrote:
> > Hello,
> > We have a "low-cost" active/passive HA ZFS based filer (with
> > NFS4/SMB/... on top) which consist of two tiny HP Proliant DL20
> > with 2 x 2 To disks in each. <snip>
> > It works well, but those are still running FreeBSD 10.3 and I'd like to
> > upgrade to 11.x. During the upgrade process the pool should be
> > read-only
> > available. I planned to do something like:
> > Has anyone ever done something similar and/or does it sound good to
> > you?
> I've tried various combinations, but not that one I'm afraid. I'm not a
> fan of iSCSI except as a work-around, but FWIW I can't spot anything
> wrong with your plan, but I'm not sure where NFS fits in.
> You will probably want to upgrade the zpools at some point (optional).
After some exchanges with people smarter than me in this area I got the
confirmation that "There's no issue with the upgrade path." :)
> I've yet to get a fully redundant ZFS implementation up and running, as
> other solutions have been more useful - such as sending incremental
> datasets to a backup at a different location. I've also run it on top of
> HAST, but it scared me.
Yes, in fact all of this started after a question I started on
freebsd-fs@ some years ago:
To my suprise I had a lot of answers and it was an interresting
discussion, you may want to check the whole thread if interested.
> One day I plan to look at heartbeat/pacemaker (available in ports/net),
> which is supposed to be the thing for it.
Yep, I had an interresting exchange on IRC (#freebsd freenode) about
it some days ago. It would be better than using a CARP only based
solution to failover (which is quite easy to split brain).
> In your situation, I think I'd proceed as follows:
> Set up a spare machine (e.g. desktop).
> Do a zfs send <zoot-dataset> to it.
> Turn off samba/nfs
> Do a zfs send <zoot-dataset> of any last minute changes.
> Make the spare machine live, but read-only.
As a security measure I have already a third "replication machine"
which zrep from the master, I could make the pool read-only from it
> They relax and do whatever I wanted to reconfigure the rack servers.
> Just a thought!
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
Belgian Biodiversity Platform (http://www.biodiversity.be)
PGP fingerprint: EEF9 F697 4B68 D275 7B11 6A25 B2BB 3710 A204 23C0
No trees were killed in the creation of this message.
However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the freebsd-questions